Complex cases deserve focused attention.
Julie & Holleman is a boutique firm representing stockholders in complex corporate disputes. We deliberately maintain a focused caseload so our lawyers can devote the attention and resources each matter deserves.
Built for complex litigation.
Julie & Holleman’s lawyers bring experience from leading plaintiffs’ and defense firms to complex stockholder litigation in courts across the country. We handle mergers and acquisitions litigation, derivative actions, securities cases, and other disputes involving corporate governance and stockholder rights.
Our size is deliberate. We select matters where we believe our experience can make a meaningful difference and remain deeply involved from investigation and strategy through discovery, trial, and appeal.
Experience earned over decades.
Before founding Julie & Holleman, our attorneys litigated significant stockholder and securities matters at leading plaintiffs’ and defense firms. Together with their work at Julie & Holleman, that experience includes major monetary recoveries, precedent-setting appellate victories, and significant corporate governance reforms.
- 75%RESCINDED
In re Investors Bancorp, Inc. Stockholder Litigation
Secured rescission of 75% of more than $50 million in challenged director compensation after a precedent-setting victory in the Delaware Supreme Court.
- $30M+
Willcox v. Dolan (The Madison Square Garden Company)
Recovered a stock award valued at more than $30 million in litigation challenging compensation awarded to the company’s CEO and controlling stockholder.
- $552M
In re Google Inc. Class C Shareholder Litigation
Secured more than $552 million in stock for investors on the eve of trial, together with governance protections addressing the founders’ control of the company.
- $12.75M
Englehart v. Brown (Flow International Corp.)
Obtained a $12.75 million settlement following extensive discovery in a merger class action involving a Washington corporation.
- $16.25M
Pfeiffer v. Toll (Toll Brothers Inc.)
Obtained a $16.25 million recovery in litigation alleging that corporate insiders sold stock while possessing material nonpublic information.
- $79M
Freudenberg v. E*TRADE Financial Corp.
Secured a $79 million recovery for investors in securities litigation arising from E*TRADE’s exposure to subprime mortgage-backed securities.
- $63M
KBC Asset Management NV v. Marsh (SCANA Corp.)
Obtained a $63 million settlement of class and derivative claims arising from the abandonment of a major nuclear construction project.
- DIRECT LISTINGPRECEDENT
Pirani v. Slack Technologies, Inc.
Secured precedent-setting rulings recognizing investors’ standing to pursue securities claims arising from Slack’s novel direct listing.
Good representation begins with a conversation.
If you have questions about an investment, a corporate transaction, or your rights as a stockholder, we’re happy to talk. We’ll listen, answer your questions as candidly as we can, and tell you whether we think there is something worth pursuing.